Mission Statement

The 24 hour VeloVulture is committed to bringing you 86400 seconds of mental anguish followed by a lingering physical exhaustion of caloric deficit and sleep deprivation during the 5th and 6th of September. This all we will trade for the small price of gathering the best stories, memories and pictures you are likely to acquire during the summer of '09.

UPDATE: We just set up a collective album on Picassa. Send an email to 24hourvelovulture2009@gmail.com and we'll give you permission to contribute to it. And if you have your own photo page we can put a link up to that too.


Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Judging Error?

UPDATE:

So after all the prizes were awarded and the paparazzi had gone home, it was discovered that there was a failure to count all of one of the team's points. What appears to have happened is that they packaged all of their smaller items in a card game box that was then taped shut without labeling it as such. To further confuse things, the masking tape label from another of their items must have transferred onto this box because, as the judges' grading notes confirm, it was treated as item #83, was not opened, and received no points. Had this box been labeled or recognized as containing other items, Team DD could have had a point total of 2835, enough to win the Vulture.

Crap, what are we supposed to do? After consulting with each other, describing the situation to former judges (without naming names or biasing with specifics), and 5 re-readings of the almost half page of explicit packet format instructions as they were stated in the rules, we have decided that this does not change results.

So there it is, judges decision stands, the team that showed us the most points with their packet won. Especially considering that DD said they had a great time otherwise, and still got some rad prizes. We sincerely hope that this will not sour relations or turn them off of the Vulture in the future.

We the organizers/judges worked very hard to get through all of the packets as quickly and as thoroughly as was possible at the time. There were certainly opportunities for errors, however we worked as a team rather than 5 individuals in order to mitigate those errors and provide the most accurate results possible for the event. The situation above was an anomaly that certainly affected results, but we believe any judging errors were relatively insignificant and would not have affected the order of placement.

1 comment:

  1. GFY Drew, if you're going to call me a liar you should do it to my face or at least take responsibility for saying it.

    -Matt Case

    ReplyDelete